Three main types of coke are produced from coking
coals:
-
Metallurgical
coke is produced in coke ovens and is mainly
used in the reduction of iron ore to pig iron in blast furnaces. It
is also consumed in blast and electric furnaces for ferro- alloy
production, reduction of metal oxides to metals and chlorides,
reduction of phosphates and sulphates, and in the reduction of
carbonates to carbides.
-
Foundry coke is produced in beehive or non-recovery
coke ovens and is used at foundries to melt iron and various
copper, lead, tin and zinc alloys in cupolas. The basic coke
requirements are the same as for metallurgical coke but the size
specification varies, depending on the size of the cupola. Foundry
coke is almost always of larger size than metallurgical coke.
-
Domestic coke, or more often semi-coke, is used as a
fuel. A low ash, easily ignited coke of high specific energy with a
very low sulphur content is required.
The
coking
processes may be carried out in either slot-type
ovens, beehive ovens, newer slot-type ovens with preheating of the
charge, travelling grate ovens, rotary kilns or in formed-coke
plants. Only the first two processes have widespread commercial
application. Slot ovens are generally located adjacent to or close
to the steelworks where valuable by-product gases can be collected
and used. Beehive (non- recovery) ovens that produce larger and
less reactive cokes for foundry use can be located at any
convenient site. Formed-coke processes have been developed but have
not been commercially implemented because the qualities of that
coke have been proven to be inferior to slot-oven and beehive oven
cokes.
Aspects of current coking practice that influence
coke properties are heating rate and duration, charge bulk density,
final temperature, and degree of preheating the charge.
The value of by-products from carbonisation
fluctuates, depending on the oil price, and is secondary to the
value of the coke. Nevertheless, the production of by-products is
important to the overall economics of a steelworks. The composition
and level of production of the by-products is dependent on the
types of coals used in the coking blend.
Metallurgical coke
The steel industry is the largest consumer of
coke, using it to reduce iron ore to pig iron in blast furnaces
where the coke has three roles:
- source
of heat through combustion with the hot air blast at the
tuyeres
- source
of reducing gas after reaction with the hot air blast to form
carbon monoxide, or by reaction with carbon dioxide produced during
the high temperature stage of iron ore reduction
-
permeable granular material with sufficient strength to support raw
materials (known as the burden) in the blast furnace through which
gas can percolate, particularly in the lower regions of the
furnace. Poor permeability affects furnace stability, output and
fuel efficiency.
During the movement of the burden down the
furnace, the coke within it is subjected to mechanical degradation
and chemical attack. Coke size decreases by:
-
reaction with carbon dioxide, which occurs in the temperature range
900–1100°C
-
reaction with alkali metal vapours at temperatures of up to
1450°C, which cause a reduction in the abrasion resistance of
the coke
- thermal
effects at temperatures of up to 1500°C, which may further
weaken the strength of the coke and reduce its size.
Increasing trends by the steel industry to use
pulverised coal
injection (PCI) to reduce coke requirements has
placed more stringent requirements on the burden quality, in
particular on the coke quality. The industry uses layer charging of
different coke size ranges. It is also recognised that larger coke
particles with a relatively uniform size distribution are required
to reduce blast resistance. It is also important that the coke has
high and consistent impact strength and abrasion resistance at the
furnace operating temperature, as the presence of fines increases
the burden resistance, increases slag viscosity and increases
carbon loss through the off-gases. Low and consistent coke moisture
content is desirable as water vapour catalyses the oxidation of
carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide and reduces the extent of direct
reduction of the iron ore. Also, high moisture diminishes the
carbon feed rate for a constant gravimetric or volumetric coke
input. Lower coke reactivity is also required at high PCI
rates.
Reifenstein (2005) reviewed several
coke quality prediction models. The
introduction of this report backgrounds the importance of coal rank
and coal macerals on coke quality. The author then explored most
coking indices, based on coal properties, used in coking coal
trade.
General relationships exits between coke quality
parameters and blast furnace performance, but these relationships
are weak due to the complexities caused by
- how the
different macerals of the blend coals fused together which
influences coke strength and fissure formation,
- the
role mineral matter plays during theplastic stage
of coking and the impact of mineral matter on cake reactivity
and
- changes
in the coke structure as it moves down the shaft of the blast
furnace.
Coking properties are mainly affected by rank,
maceral types and inorganic matter of the coal. Rank is best
determined by the mean maximum reflectance of vitrinite (Rv,max) in
the coal. Volatile matter on a dry mineral matter free basis is
also an indicator of coal rank. Measurement of the plastic
properties during carbonisation (e.g. Gieseler fluidity) is
commonly used in evaluating component coals to be used in a coking
blend, though there is some debate on how fluidity influences the
important coke properties of
coke
strength after reaction (CSR) and the
size of the stabilised
coke.
The table below lists the main quality parameters
commonly used in the evaluation of coking coals.
Coke
property
|
Typical
ranges
|
Australian
Standard
|
J.I.S. drum
indices
|
D1530
|
>90
|
AS 1038.13
|
D15150
|
>80
|
Micum indices
|
M40
|
>74.9
|
M10
|
<8.8
|
Reactivity to carbon dioxide (CRI)
|
%
|
<35
|
Strength after reaction (CSR)
|
%>10mm
|
>50
|
Size range
|
mm
|
25–75
|
AS 1038.18
|
Mean size
|
mm
|
50±5
|
Size <25mm
|
%
|
<5
|
Moisture
|
%
|
4.0±1.5
|
AS 1038.2
|
Ash
|
%
|
10.0±0.5
|
AS 1038.4
|
Total sulphur
|
%
|
Target±0.02
|
AS 1038.6.3.2
|
In blending coals for coke manufacture, the
properties of the blend can be estimated as follows:
- Rv,max
is determined from the percentage-weighted average of vitrinite
determined on the volume percentage.
-
assuming the log of the Gieseler maximum fluidity is additive,
though this is not strictly correct for all blends
- the
proximate and ultimate analyses are additive.